Julien Rioux <jri...@physics.utoronto.ca> writes: | On 13/03/2012 8:13 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> But why? >> >> This is the perfect case for a separate repo. >> >> [...] >> >> | Assuming that the pristinity of the lyx repo as a whole is so >> | important that we cannot allow trusted developers to create branches, >> | then maybe such branches can be allowed in the lyx-staging repo? Can >> | we have branches in this one, please? >> >> That would be better, but I do not understand why you couldn't have this >> in your own repo. >> > | And I don't understand why we couldn't have branches in our repo. > | I want it simple, and I want it centralized.
I have a suspision that you are new to git and distributed VCS? At least before you decide what you really want I think you should try to do it the git way. -- Lgb
