Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I like it, but I was hoping we could have a drop-in replacement (so that > for example clang would still use a real std:string). This would require > to get rid of the str(). Isn't it possible to desclare a an operator() > to translate transparently to std::string?
I believe it would be possible technically, but do we want that? This would mean that people developing with clang or MSVC would break the build from time to time, because they would have no possibility to notice if the use a std::string member which does not exist in trivstring. Georg
