Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016 um 15:36:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:40:59PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I'm still not sure what the implications of moving to CMake as our > > > official build system are (I should have made this more clear in my > > > > To start with: If you make tarball with autotools and cmake is there > > difference between those two, do we get the same files/and their contets? > > Good question. I don't know. There is no 'lyxdist' target for CMake and > no 'dist' target so I stopped there.
# make package_source
--> LyX-2.3.tar.xz
or
# make git_archive
--> LyX-2.3.0-47674git-Linux.tgz
> By the way, I saw your comment just above the definition of the lyxdist
> target, which you introduced in 2010 (d407a15c):
>
> --------
> #Wait some time for bumping automake 1.11, which can use dist-xz
> #directly without this code, which is to be removed.
> #xz has low compression by default, but can be affected via
> #export XZ_OPT=-9ev put somewhere in the makefile.
> lyxdist: dist
> bunzip2 $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar.bz2
> xz -9 $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar
> ls -hl $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar.*
> --------
>
> Should we use dist-xz directly now?
>
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
