On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016 um 15:36:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:40:59PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I'm still not sure what the implications of moving to CMake as our > > > > official build system are (I should have made this more clear in my > > > > > > To start with: If you make tarball with autotools and cmake is there > > > difference between those two, do we get the same files/and their contets? > > > > Good question. I don't know. There is no 'lyxdist' target for CMake and > > no 'dist' target so I stopped there. > > # make package_source > --> LyX-2.3.tar.xz > or > # make git_archive > --> LyX-2.3.0-47674git-Linux.tgz
Thanks. There are many differences compared to the .tar from autotools. I can list the difference if you want, but since there are so many it might be easier for you to take a look yourself. You can make the tar with autotools as follows: ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist I did the comparison with a git checkout of 2.2.0, partly because make lyxdist does not work for me now (I'll send a separate email about this). Note also that for me make package_source produces a tar.gz, not a tar.xz as you suggested above. I don't think this difference is important but I mention it in case it signals a fundamental difference between our systems that explains why I get such a different tar from the autotools tar. Scott > > > By the way, I saw your comment just above the definition of the lyxdist > > target, which you introduced in 2010 (d407a15c): > > > > -------- > > #Wait some time for bumping automake 1.11, which can use dist-xz > > #directly without this code, which is to be removed. > > #xz has low compression by default, but can be affected via > > #export XZ_OPT=-9ev put somewhere in the makefile. > > lyxdist: dist > > bunzip2 $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar.bz2 > > xz -9 $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar > > ls -hl $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar.* > > -------- > > > > Should we use dist-xz directly now? > > > > Scott > > Kornel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
