Am 03.10.2017 um 22:06 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: > > Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2017 um 19:59:38, schrieb Stephan Witt > <st.w...@gmx.net> >> Am 02.10.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: >>> >>> Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2017 um 22:16:43, schrieb Stephan Witt >>> <st.w...@gmx.net> >>>> Am 01.10.2017 um 10:20 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: >>>>> >>>>> Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2017 um 06:59:51, schrieb Stephan Witt >>>>> <st.w...@gmx.net> >>>>>> Am 30.09.2017 um 20:15 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:53PM +0000, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But this is too complex for 2.3.0, IMO. So I’d put my patch in and >>>>>>>>> let some nice guys change the splash files. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From what I understand, after your most recent patch is put in 2.3.x, we >>>>>>> no longer need a patch for the splash files. Is that correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it’s correct. I need to put it into 2.3.x after it’s in master. >>>>>> I’m not sure if I need some feedback it doesn’t break the build on >>>>>> other platforms. The Cmake build I've not extended too. >>>>> >>>>> OK, so the only change for cmake would be to add maxima and inkscape to >>>>> the list of installed scripts? >>>> >>>> Yes, and no. Yes this is needed - but simple. The patch is there. >>>> >>>> The lyxconvert utility is not build with cmake. >>>> >>>> Stephan >>> >>> I tried it at c2eb1a1, builds on linux. >> >> Thanks. In principle on Mac it works too. The install target is >> not as I’d expect it - but that doesn’t matter, ATM. >> >> I’d propose to disable the build on linux. It shouldn't be installed there. >> >> Stephan > > OK, but note that building on linux was helpful to create the patch. > Should it be disabled on Windows too? I cannot test this case.
Yes. Mac only. Stephan
