On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:29:08AM +0000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 06/02/2018 à 01:57, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > This is the main question IMO. These days, we cache QTextLayout objects, > > > which already contain the typeset glyphs. > > > > I know nothing about this. If we decide to not use the pixmap cache, > > would we do a prefs to prefs change at this point in the release > > process? Or would we just ignore the pref in our internal code? > > We can try to repair it if it is easy. Full removal of the code is for > master only, in 2.3 we could decide to hide the option and not act of > existing value. So IMO there is no rush to remove the option and modify > lyxrc version.
Makes sense. Should we then ask Joel/Stephan for a bisect to see if the repair is easy? If the repair is easy, let's just fix it and not mess with anything else. If the repair is non-trivial, let's not fix it and instead just not act on the pixmap pref. Does that seem like a good plan for 2.3.0? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
