On 07-Dec-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> again: I inserted the label inside the ert with lyx
> because it is easier than to write \label{...}.
> in 1.2 there is no insert->label inside ert possible.
> therefore it makes sense to convert a label inside
> ert from 1.1.6 to 1.2 as \label{...}. than all
> works well!
The rule is set! Before you where able to insert ANY inset inside of
ERT text. Now we have the rule that you cannot. So we will read the
code as described by Dekel (and we have to fix the problem reported).
I don't think we will reinterpret good written insets to insert them
as ERT inside the ert inset.
We could add a feature of merge two adiacent equal insets to one, but
don't count on that in the near future. There are enough bugs to fix and
we have codefreeze. So this could be a new feature for a 1.2.x (x > 0)
release and for 1.3.0.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Paranoids are people, too; they have their own problems. It's easy
to criticize, but if everybody hated you, you'd be paranoid too.
-- D.J. Hicks
