On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > The rule is set! Before you where able to insert ANY inset inside of > ERT text. Now we have the rule that you cannot. So we will read the > code as described by Dekel (and we have to fix the problem reported). > I don't think we will reinterpret good written insets to insert them > as ERT inside the ert inset. > > We could add a feature of merge two adiacent equal insets to one, but > don't count on that in the near future. There are enough bugs to fix and > we have codefreeze. So this could be a new feature for a 1.2.x (x > 0) > release and for 1.3.0.
I disagree! You start an inset with begin_inset and end it with end_inset! for ert: all between start and end is ert, nothing else. HErbert
