On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:42:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Well, InsetText can have nested insets, so we could have "real" labels in
> | InsetERT, real math etc...
>
> you are kidding I hope.
I don't think so.
Currently, once you have decided to go to ERT land (and there are a few
reasons to do so every now and then) you are completely on your own. You
basically end up with an awful bloated text editor.
If you want a label there, well, write '\label{...}'. Not nice, you lose
all the LyX gimmicks.
Alternately, you start breaking up this into three parts ([ERT] [label]
[ERT]). Not nice either: Try to move the label one "word" to the right.
And it's a hack of course: The semantics you want is "a label somewhere
in ERT" and you got "some ERT, a label, some more ERT".
When InsetERT is basically the same as InsetText (which I did not know),
there is not even a technical reason to disallow insets there. On the
contrary...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
