Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>> We (I) might eventually do something with this... better would of >>> course to get all useres to use newer compilers. >> > | Sooner rather than later would be good too. I think we all value > | Jean-Marc's contributions... > > Note that when I do this I do it blind, I do not have gcc 2.96 > available nor 2.95
So, do your best and leave it to the protagonists to make it work. At least give them a picture of what they need. > | Just have a support/detail directory, á la boost. Then you'll > | never be offended by the contents of support/detail/gcc29x >> > | ;-) > > There are make and configure issues. > (dirty stuff) Really? Why not support/debug.h #ifndef DEBUG_H #define DEBUG_H #if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ < 3) #include detail/gcc29x/debug.h #else #include detail/fully_compliant/debug.h #endif #endif // NOT DEBUG_H -- Angus
