Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I feel the exact opposite. the cygwin_path_fix pollutes the "portable" > code, pollutes the "not cygwin files"
But it makes it explicit why external_path() is needed. > The second patch is the nice one IMO. Now I don't like either anymore. The problem of both fixes is that they use a trailing '/' as flag whether external_path() is needed or not. This will strike back sooner or later. Georg
