Angus Leeming wrote:
LOL! I think You are. You've confused this with "const &"
and to add to the confusion (at least mine):why don't i see any invalid behavior or crashes with my original (wrong) patch?
Angus Leeming wrote:
LOL! I think You are. You've confused this with "const &"
and to add to the confusion (at least mine):why don't i see any invalid behavior or crashes with my original (wrong) patch?