Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> You should have said something then. Because without
Abdelrazak> anyone saying anything it's difficult to get an idea. 3
Abdelrazak> saying yes and 0 saying no... I think you get the picture.
Say what? "please do not commit before showing the patch?"
Do I have to say that explicitely on each and every feature I think
someone may come up with some day?
I am repeating my self but it's a feature that touch _nothing_ at the
current tree. So I reckon it is special. Bo have apologized already for
this, could we please move on?
What would have been wrong with committing in a branch, seriously?
Convenience...
The fact that these decisions are made only in terms of personal
convenience makes it more difficult for scons to prove its personal
merits. It is a pity.
Convenience is a driving factor for me when I develop.
Abdel.
