The controller/computer probably can't handle the higher data rate of the HD 
format (twice the DD rate).
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Stephen Adolph 
  To: m...@bitchin100.com 
  Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 9:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [M100] question regarding floppy disks.


  interestingly,


  Yes, if I take an HD disk, and tape over the hole to make it appear to be a 
DD disk, then it works.


  But why?


  the floppy is capable of both formats...



  On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 7:39 PM Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Have you tried closing the HD sense hole with a piece of tape or similar?
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Stephen Adolph 
      To: m...@bitchin100.com 
      Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 6:08 PM
      Subject: Re: [M100] question regarding floppy disks.


      the Coco is using it's standard controller


      When issuing the DSKINI 0 command the coco tries to format for 180kB.


      The combination of 

      (Coco, std controller, PC 1.44MB drive + a 720kB dd floppy) works


      whereas
      (Coco, std controller, PC 1.44MB drive + a 1.44MBB hd floppy) does not 
work


      this is something I don't understand!






      On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 5:42 PM Gregory McGill <arcadeshop...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

        likely the floppy controller doesn't support 80 tracks or high 
density..  most of the controllers of the era are ds/sd 40 track or dsdd 40 
track..   are you able to format 720k? ds/dd 80 track? 


        Greg


        On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 2:38 PM Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

          I'll start by saying this isn't an M100 or TPDD discussion, but just 
looking to understand something.


          I have a Tandy Coco3 with a 3.5 inch floppy drive.  The drive is a 
standard PC drive and it is working well.


          Seems though that I cannot use 1.44 MB floppies in that drive. They 
don't seem to want to format.


          I really don't understand where the problem could be.
          - the drive and the floppy are compatible
          - the disk is known good and formats at 1.44MB in a PC
          - if it can support 135 TPI, why can't it support 35 TPI?


          Does anyone know what's going on?


          thx
          Steve

Reply via email to