son of a gun, that did it Kurt! Nice!
I was pulling what is left of my hair out!



On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:30 PM Kurt McCullum <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here is what I have had to do to get Virtual-T in Windows to work properly.
> 1) Start Virtual-T with no emulation for a COM port
> 2) Select Use Host Port and pick your COM port
> 3) Exit Virtual-T. If you don't do this, it won't work.
> 4) Re-Start Virtual-T and you are good to go.
>
> That's the only way I have been able to use Virtual-T with a host port. If
> (when) you loose connection, you have to do the following.
> 1) Start virtual-t
> 2) Select Select No emulation.
> 3) Exit.
> Go to step 1 above and repeat.
>
> Sounds crazy but that is what works for me.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021, at 1:15 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
>
> Update, back to the subject of this thread.  Getting VirtualT to accept
> input characters from serial ports.
>
> After all this experimentation, and success with the sniffer
> configuration, I still cannot get VirtualT to receive a byte from a serial
> port.
>
> Nothing seems to make a difference; regardless of port type, settings etc,
> VirtualT cannot receive a byte from the external world.
>
> I would have thought I could at least run a TELCOM session over the PC
> COM1 port but all I can do is send data out, I can't receive any data.
>
> Does anyone have any tips on how to get this working?
>
> thx
> Steve
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:19 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
> I'm having some trouble getting bi-directional serial port working on
> virtualT.
>
> * Windows 10
> * VT 1.7 (and also tried 1.6)
> * using a real serial port COM 1, or also COM2 FTDI USB serial port
> * Model T connected to COM1.
>
> I can send out from VirtualT no problem, but nothing seems to flow in the
> return direction.
>
> I thought this worked.. struggling to understand why it is jammed up.
>
> On the same physical setup, if I kill VirtualT and start TeraTerm instead,
> it works bi-directionally no problem.
>
> I may try Linux next.
>
> thx
> Steve
>
>
>

Reply via email to