WiFi adds an extra element to the problem because unlike one-character-at-a-time RS232 the data is in uninterruptible packets; when the M100 sends an XOFF to stop sending, the other end doesn't respond until it's finished sending the current packet and since the M100 doesn't send the XOFF until its buffer is almost full already you'll almost certainly overrun the buffer.
Some Ethernet devices let you set the packet size; if you can set yours down to 1 you may be able to go faster. Aside from that you might be able to use a discrete buffer between the M100 and the modem, such as was used for printers in 'the old days'... On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:46 PM Jeff Gonzales <gonzobra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am using Arcanbyte which ties in to my Wi-Fi so no copper. I did change > both sides to XON/XOFF but I haven't tried 600 baud yet. > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 6:46 PM Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Are you using a 'real' copper POTS telephone line? >> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 3:06 PM Alex ... <abortretryf...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is it enabled on both sides? On the modem itself and make sure the last >>> letter of the STAT string in TELCOM is "E" and not "D" >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:27 AM Jeff Gonzales <gonzobra...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have XON/XOFF set but it is still getting garbled. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 5:25 AM Alex ... <abortretryf...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Definitely flow control. My 1200 baud Kantronics KPC-3 does the same >>>>> thing in TELCOM if flow control isn't on. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 22:08 Jeff Gonzales <gonzobra...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I just got myself an ArcaneByte modem. I connected to the >>>>>> fozztexx BBS and posted a message! Not quite as exciting as my first >>>>>> post >>>>>> when I was 9 years old but it was cool getting it set up. >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem is that I can't get the m100 to run at 1200 baud. It >>>>>> skips text and displays garbage sometimes. I slowed the modem down to >>>>>> 300 >>>>>> baud and it works fine. Shouldn't it be able to go faster? I thought >>>>>> the >>>>>> serial port was much faster than the internal modem. It's okay, but I >>>>>> think 1200 baud would be better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Jeff >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my >>> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. >>> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. >>> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold >>> them is left as an exercise for the reader. >>> The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for >>> the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral >>> polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks /usr/games/fortune >>> >>
