Yes, the M100 caps always need to be replaced. The RS232 output puts a 
significant load on the -5V which makes for flaky LCD and RS232 operation. If 
there are any traces under/around the caps that look dark they need to be 
mechanically cleaned and neutralized (if corrosion was bad) to stave off 
further corrosion. I have done a few videos on M100 recapping describing the 
process. 

Jeff

 

From: M100 <m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com> On Behalf Of Jesse Bertier
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 12:57 PM
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Subject: Re: [M100] Intermittent problem at higher baud rates on RS-232 
interface

 

Hi Jeff,

 

Thank you - I noted my serial # was after the 306000001 mark, and verified the 
330 ohm resistors are in fact on my board.  I then took a closer look over the 
board and noticed just about every electrolytic cap leaked.  The flipflop near 
the power supply area was also warm, so I powered it off and may order some 
caps.  I’m thinking at this point a recap before digging into the RS-232 port 
any further would be a good place to start.  

 

This is a fantastic group, thank you all for the replies!





On Jul 9, 2023, at 7:12 PM, <bir...@soigeneris.com 
<mailto:bir...@soigeneris.com> > <bir...@soigeneris.com 
<mailto:bir...@soigeneris.com> > wrote:

 

The TPDD1, TPDD2, Backpack, etc. use 19200 successfully. If you can adjust the 
intercharacter delay on the TNC is might help. Also note that some early M100s 
had the wrong resistors in the output lines for the RS232 port. They fitted 
5.6K from factory but they quickly revised that down to 330ohm as some devise 
would not work with it. 

I did a video on the factory mod a while back. A link to the technical bulletin 
is in the video description:

https://youtu.be/KPFnwv_nDD8

 

Jeff Birt

 

From: M100 <m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com 
<mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com> > On Behalf Of Gregory McGill
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2023 5:40 PM
To: m...@bitchin100.com <mailto:m...@bitchin100.com> 
Subject: Re: [M100] Intermittent problem at higher baud rates on RS-232 
interface

 

there's no hardware flow control on the 100 with telcom

use a better terminal and hardware flow control at any baud rate over 2400 

 

 

On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 3:19 PM Jesse Bertier <berti...@gmail.com 
<mailto:berti...@gmail.com> > wrote:

First time getting my hands on a model T.  I am attempting to connect to a TNC 
at 9600 baud.  I have both matched for 8,N,1 and 9600 baud.  TNC works with 
other PCs.  I’m using TELCOM and set the parameters correctly.  What happens at 
9600 baud is the text coming into the m100 is garbled mostly and on occasion 
some valid words come across.  When I set both to 300 baud, works perfectly.   
It seems to be problematic if there’s a solid block of text coming in, like a 
string of 20-30 words for example.  

Before I dig into the problem with the service manual and get out the scope, 
does anyone know if these are supposed to work well at 9600 or up to 19,200 ?  
Or, does the buffer or machine get overloaded at higher rates?  Is TELCOM the 
issue? 

Sent from my iPhone

 

Reply via email to