I do not respect some of your decisions and idea flows... I can't
judge you as a person because I do not know you. I can only judge you
from your online communication and yes, sometimes your communication
style is really bad (as well as mine is, but the difference is that I
know it ;-).
This is one of the cases. I simply have the feeling that you want
something, but you are not able to tell it directly... I can only
guess what it is - do you want to provide milestone builds or hacked-
together AQUA builds with several mixed cwses inside it and mark it
as AQUA Alpha, beta, RC whatever? Why? It is a lot of work! Semi-
automated work. I simply do not understand why anyone wants to do
that. Maho, please do not read this and continue in your work :-))
The milestone itself is broken.
And could have been fixed easely. But stupid method gives stupid
result.
Yes. You or someone else could fix it faster than it got fixed in
unomacli64. And the only stupid thing is to argue about this :-(
We are not Russian administration : OpenOffice.org is supposed to
be a free software, with some compromises when something is wrong,
and quick fixes when needed.
Does the "quick fix" (I call it hack!) break something else? Or some
other platform?
As Mac OS X Lead, I'd like to see a project able to provide working
builds first.
;-) So why haven't you fixed the problem before?
I as a project member would like to see the current status as is.
Without hacks.
I as a member of QA project would like to see the current status as
is. Without hacks, so I know what I test.
I as a l10n co-lead want Mac port sub-project to build for all
possible locales so our members could see the current status and
could help in their language.
--
Pavel Janík
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
