Yes. You or someone else could fix it faster than it got fixed in
unomacli64.
Please read again : I used the word integrated. And the issue was
fixed before Maho started his build, and the fix could have been used.
No, because the purpose of these builds is to show the current not
future status. This is where we differ.
Does the "quick fix" (I call it hack!) break something else? Or
some other platform?
This is not a hack. Extract the cws and apply it to m221 is
correct, mainly when the cws is necessary to make the build work !
If you are providing milestone builds, you can't do that by
definition. And we agreed on this on Mac port IRC meeting - see the
log here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/
Log_Mac_Meeting_18_July_2007
Instead of discuss about different point of views, could we have
serious figures about what is really downloaded ? I'm sure this
will help more to decide a more "reallistic" number of locales.
This is exactly why we often disagree. The flow of your ideas is
incompatible with mine ;-) I think that the download statistics are
orthogonal (completely independent) on the number of locales we
should provide. How do you judge if we will provide e.g. vi locale
based on the data in the statistics?
--
Pavel Janík
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
