On Friday, October 5, 2001, at 10:24 AM, Brad Pettit wrote:

> XML isn't a panacea for file corruption. Heck, it's probably easier to 
> corrupt an XML file if it changes a lot. It's just easier for a 
> sophisticated user to investigate and potentially fix a problem.

Re-reading my message, I could see how it could have come off like I was 
suggesting this, but it wasn't the intention. I was just commenting on 
Harry's post.

    - Scott


To unsubscribe send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/macie-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to