On 28 Mar 2011, at 10:07, Nathan Sims wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
>
>> Maybe part of the issue is which WebObjects. Originally, WO and EOF
>> were Objective C; java was supported by a bridge. Then, everything
>> became Java, first, and objective C was supported by a bridge. Now,
>> that bridge (as I understand it) is gone, and Apple is just doing
>> generic Java.
>
> No one has ever been able to give me a convincing answer as to why EOF was
> ditched in favor of CoreData. I can understand EOF, it feels object-oriented
> and ObjC-like. CoreData is a like a plate of spaghetti to my mind, very C++
> like, syntaxy, and hard to get your head around ...
>
According to Wil Shipley it done by Serlet and Shipley seems happy enough with
it.
David P Henderson
--
"A lie can run around the world before the truth can get its boots on."
-- Attributed to many
_______________________________________________
MacOSX-talk mailing list
MacOSX-talk@omnigroup.com
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
