On 2014-4-8 22:35 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2014, at 07:34, Chris Jones wrote: > >>>> PS: It's not an issue of me personally upgrading the OS. I'll do that >>>> sooner or later. But it would be slightly suboptimal if the port only >>>> worked on 10.9. >> >> As a general point, I agree, only OSX10.9 has full c++11 support. However, >> upstream claim to be targeting 10.8 and 10.9, so I would hope it would work >> on OSX10.8 as well (to be tested sometime, by someone who has access to a >> 10.8 machine). Whilst not ideal, I think this is reasonable coverage (given >> root5 will remain available for all versions). > > Well, libc++ (with full C++11 support) is included in 10.8, it’s just not the > default. As long as root doesn’t use any other libraries, it should build > fine with that, if you instruct it to. But then any other software that wants > to use root would have to do that as well.
Indeed, if you can get around the issues with using a non-default runtime on 10.8, then that should transfer pretty easily to 10.7 and 10.6 as well. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
