One thing if you can play a NLS book on a computer you can very easly  
capture the output and record it in the background. Thus rip the book  
to mp3.

On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Jenny Kennedy (Howard) wrote:

>
> I understand why NLS and RFB and D feel they must incript their
> books.  I get that.
>
> But why they couldn't of picked a form like Audible is beyond me.
>
> I think a few groups out there, Bookshare and Greg's Beyond Books
> program shows clearly that you can put your offerings out there in a
> "mainstream" format playable on "mainstream" devices and still
> maintain the rules/laws covering copyright laws.
>
> The NLS for example has said they are suffering under the tight
> budgets everyone else is.  I think if they'd offer their stuff in an
> audible-ish format it would wind up saving them money in the longrun.
>
> Each NLS patron could tell his or her reagonal/subreagonal library
> that rather than be issued a player they'd like to receive service
> digitally and here are the computers/players they have.  It would be
> much like how a device has to be audible ready?
> Then the library could send them a file to put on their computer to
> authorise their iTunes/iPod for example, or if windows users their
> version of iTunes and you know list of compatible mp3 type players.
> Then it would just work like Audible books.
>
> On the Mac for example, the library would send a file that would
> install in iTunes thus authorising your computer and iPod/iPhone or
> whatever MP3 player you have to work with your NLS account.  Just like
> the webopac online book ordering system used by many NLS service
> centres, you'd put in username and password to access the books...
> This way they wouldn't have to send out as many specialised players,
> service them, pay for mailing containers, cartridges and fixing this
> stuff or replacing it when it breaks.  These options would of corse be
> open to those who wanted a player or who didn't have access to
> computers/internet/mp3 players but that number would be smaller than
> having to provide all this to every member nation wide.
> See what I'm trying to say?
> It could be done, I just wonder if people thought about it at the
> time.  Perhaps when they were picking how things would be passed out
> all the mainstream built in access being offered by Apple wasn't as
> wide spread as it is now.  Maybe if Apple becomes explosively popular
> within the blind community NLS and RFB and D will change their mind?
> I'm not meaning to leave windows people out of the picture, I'm sure
> something very much like how audible on the mac say can be done for
> them. Well I know is being done for them but I'm coming at this from a
> mac users point of view. I hope I'm making my thoughts understood. no
> hard feelings right?
>
> Best Wishes
> Jenny Kennedy (Howard)
> blueskyes9112...@gmail.com
> Olathe, Kansas USA
>
> Join me on FaceBook:
> Personal Profile - www.facebook.com/blueskyes
> And feel free to join "The Blind Parents of FaceBook" group.  Search
> for it in groups or contact me for details.
>
> Follow me via twitter using the username: ben_folds_fan
>
>
> >

louie
louiem...@wavecable.com




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to