On 23 Jun 2015, at 13:38, Jason White <ja...@jasonjgw.net> wrote: > Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listse...@me.com> wrote: >> I dunno what the situation >> is on Linux nowadays, but last I looked it was all still GNOME and QT hadn’t >> yet made their bridge. Is that still true? > > No. QT made their bridge directly to the AT-SPI layer, which uses DBus for > inter-process communication. That is, QT bypassed the ATK C interfaces.
Well, that’s perfectly valid (my dislike of DBus notwithstanding). In fact that’s the kind of interworking I’d be very happy to see in OS X. And I’m glad we have another pillar upon which accessibility APIs can stand. That’s two major operating systems that correctly support accessibility interworking. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
