On Fri, June 5, 2009 13:02, Anderson Lizardo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Mikko Vartiainen<mvartiai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> just as a side note, perhaps it's related: The units we saw at the >>> danish weekend only had the extras-devel repo but not the original >>> nokia repos installed. So everything requiring stuff from other repos >>> than extras-devel was not installable. >> >> This is possible cause. All of the packages in extras-devel assume that >> SDK repository is available. This is false assumption for the device, >> but it has to be made because there is no way of knowing what is >> preinstalled to device or available from possible default repositories. >>
My understanding is that everything that is in nokia-binaries, should be on the device firmware by default. The device should not have nokia-binaries in the repository list? > > That's one point I already asked once through IRC and no one could > answer: how could we make sure a package in fremantle extras-devel > will be installable on the device, if we don't know yet which packages are > SDK only and which will be available on the user's device? > At one point we want to add tests to the autobuilder/repository management tools to see if all runtime dependencies can be resolved. But this is not possible without Nokia providing us a list of packages(and dependency tree) to be used on the customer firmware. Here you see one of the problems in action which you get when the target OS is secret :( > > > Regards, > -- > Anderson Lizardo > OpenBossa Labs - INdT > Manaus - Brazil -- Niels Breet maemo.org webmaster _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
