On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 15:21 +0000, Gary Birkett wrote: > > I totally agree, it is not part of the testing regime itself and as > long as > an app is technically capable it passes the test. > the checklist has been defined here: > > http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist
Assuming that you are talking about ignoring UI issues, rather than just being outraged (outraged!!) that I apparently wanted the app to be ready for Maemo _6_: I don't claim to know what the aims of the testing are. But I did see this on the main testing page: http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing#The_extras-testing_QA_queue_.26_you " Offering good quality community software to owners of Maemo devices is a top priority. We have a chance to show the world that open source software developed by community projects can match commercial software in terms of features, usability, reliability and fun. But we also face the risk of getting maemo.org Extras associated with beta quality software made by geeks for geeks only, without the last mile of polishing. " So I've been a) assuming that an application can't be impressive if if doesn't use Maemo 5 widgets and generally follow the Maemo 5 UI layout. b) assuming that the application maintainer would like some feedback. (Note that the wiki is generally verbose, fragmented, repetitive and hard to navigate around. That's not because it's a wiki.) -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
