2012/3/12 Remco Rijnders <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:34:14AM +0100, Maarten wrote in > <[email protected]>: > >> Op maandag 12 maart 2012 07:56:30 schreef Remco Rijnders: >> [...] >>> >>> While I support the candidacy of both candidates (if I have a say in it, >>> I >>> don't know), but I think there still needs to be some sort of >>> acclamation. >>> Imagine if someone unsuitable would volunteer and we have seats >>> available? >>> Do we want to let them in unopposed? >> >> >> I agree. >> >> But otoh: >> >> Since only association members vote for board, and i think i see several >> team >> leaders already agreeing and noone disagreeing... i think this would >> qualify >> as being acclamated... >> >> i guess if this sort of procedure is being followed, all that is needed is >> a >> timelimit for someone to disagree and then the email of stating if the new >> members are accepted... > > > I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and > procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem > overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues, it > is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of having > people claim "but you did x back then".
That was the point of my mail. Avoiding possible future discussions. -- wobo
