2012/3/12 Remco Rijnders <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Michael wrote in > <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and >>> procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem >>> overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues, >>> it is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of >>> having people claim "but you did x back then". >> >> >> Nice try, but as seen on -dev, when i try to follow the procedure and >> rules, people complain, and when i don't, people ask me to do so. > > > Well, first of all, people will always find something to complain about... > > That said, and assuming you are referring to what I think you are referring > to... I think in that case the confusion is about what the policy really is. > The criteria as mentioned in the last meeting seem to differ from what I > read on the -dev list now. I don't care much one way or the other, but I > think here too being clear on the policy is the most important thing. > > Secondly, and I do mean this in the nicest and most constructive way... it > would not hurt if also other developers / council members would speak their > mind when such things come up. For this we need 1) them to speak up more, 2) > for you to not to speak on their behalf when you have not consulted them > yet.
Additional to Remco's first sentence we should not mix unrelated discussions. At hand is a discussion of the associates about a policy for the election of members of the board. -- wobo
