I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues, it is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of having people claim "but you did x back then".Nice try, but as seen on -dev, when i try to follow the procedure and rules, people complain, and when i don't, people ask me to do so.
Well, first of all, people will always find something to complain about...That said, and assuming you are referring to what I think you are referring to... I think in that case the confusion is about what the policy really is. The criteria as mentioned in the last meeting seem to differ from what I read on the -dev list now. I don't care much one way or the other, but I think here too being clear on the policy is the most important thing.
Secondly, and I do mean this in the nicest and most constructive way... it would not hurt if also other developers / council members would speak their mind when such things come up. For this we need 1) them to speak up more, 2) for you to not to speak on their behalf when you have not consulted them yet.
Cheers, Remco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
