Le lundi 12 mars 2012 à 08:40 +0100, Remco Rijnders a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:34:14AM +0100, Maarten wrote in > <[email protected]>: > >Op maandag 12 maart 2012 07:56:30 schreef Remco Rijnders: > >[...] > >> While I support the candidacy of both candidates (if I have a say in it, I > >> don't know), but I think there still needs to be some sort of acclamation. > >> Imagine if someone unsuitable would volunteer and we have seats available? > >> Do we want to let them in unopposed? > > > >I agree. > > > >But otoh: > > > >Since only association members vote for board, and i think i see several team > >leaders already agreeing and noone disagreeing... i think this would qualify > >as being acclamated... > > > >i guess if this sort of procedure is being followed, all that is needed is a > >timelimit for someone to disagree and then the email of stating if the new > >members are accepted... > > I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and > procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem > overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues, > it is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of > having people claim "but you did x back then".
Nice try, but as seen on -dev, when i try to follow the procedure and rules, people complain, and when i don't, people ask me to do so. -- Michael Scherer
