OK. The Sparse vector improvements we have now are already a lot
faster than what was in 0.1, so that is good. I'd suggest that
whoever is the Release Mgr. for this release takes care of the signing
stuff. I'll look at the Label (LLR) stuff by Monday.
On Oct 15, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
I'd vote to delay 165 for 0.3 but do it in trunk asap after 0.2 so
folks can get their hands on it.
Sean Owen wrote:
It still sounds somewhat significant to me. Either it's rushed or
takes a while and both seem negative.
+1 This is why
I think it is vital, at least, to put a schedule on this, or else we
are basically saying 0.2 is to not be released indefinitely, and
that's no good. Last time we said we'd finish up and release this was
2 weeks ago, and there hasn't been progress on this issue.
I'm starting to feel strongly enough to call for a vote?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll
<gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
I don't think it is that big. We can likely just make another
implementation of Vector. We don't have to convert everything to
Colt.
