I am a bit ambivalent, but net +1 on this. The deciding factor for me is that it makes it easier to express the sub-projects.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1. We'd like to organize several subprojects we wish to introduce (Core, > NLP, Recommenders/Taste, Ports - C++, etc.) that wouldn't really fit as > Lucene subprojects. > > And the collections package, vectors, verification and evaluation > code, potential test data sets... yes, makes sense to make it a TLP. I > don't think Lucene folks will mind -- it's not like Mahout is going to > depart from using Lucene/ Hadoop, etc. > > Not that my voice counts much here, but +1 to the idea. > > Dawid > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
