The ongoing admin is really no big deal. The PMC has to report to the board once a month. As Grant noted, the initial work is mostly a gift from infra.
I don't see any harm in getting 0.3 out first if that makes folks more comfortable. On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't say that I really understand the issues (if there are any) of > the Mahout project running under Lucene's PMC vs. a Mahout PMC, but it > sounds like that would be a big factor in deciding whether the project > should be migrated to its own TLP, eg: if Mahout discussions took up a > significant portion of the Lucene PMC meetings for example. > > It doesn't sounds like much of anything else would change from the > perspective of a user or new contributor like myself. From my vantage > point I don't see much impetus to change at this very moment. If we > end up getting something that looks like a solid start on a C++ port, > it might be worth revisiting, but even then that could start off as a > submodule. > > http://mahout.apache.org would be easier to remember :) > > At the end of the day, I think I'm +1 for waiting as well. > > Drew > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 to waiting. >> >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: >> >>> In the end, I still am +1, but think it makes sense to wait until after >>> 0.3. Besides, since the next board meeting is Wednesday, this will give us >>> more time to think about it. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ted Dunning, CTO >> DeepDyve >> >
