On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> wrote: > On 09/17/2013 10:04 PM, Franck Martin wrote: >> >> 1) If you keep the From: header as it is then, we will still have the same >> problems > > > Perhaps I wasn't clear. The From: of the outer message would contain the > list address. The From: of its message/rfc822 payload would be unchanged > from that of the incoming message. > > My questions only had to do with the Reply-To: of the outer message in > cases where the list was set to mung Reply-To: in some way. > > Ah, makes sense, sorry
>> 2) the purpose of the encapsulation message/rfc822 is not meant to preserve >> the DKIM signature, DKIM is not meant to be verified by MUAs > > > No, but that is a side effect, at least where content filtering has not > altered the message. Yes indeed _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
