On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Aaryan Bhagat wrote:
> >I think your approach is probably valid, but it adds complexity to the
> >process. Complexity is not necessarily bad, but unnecessary complexity
> >is bad because it makes things more fragile and bug prone and more
> >difficult to maintain.
> >
> >So the bottom line question is whether this additional complexity is
> >worth it. I am not convinced that it is. I am not saying absolutely that
> >it isn't. I can't say that for sure without understanding the benefits
> >it provides, but at this point, I'm skeptical.
> 
> Yes, I understand and maybe I too ignored this part due to inexperience 
> in large scale development.
> But can community speed things up and give an absolute final on the 
> type of implementation,  I am sorry for being so straight but my 
> evaluations are close and I want to make through my GSoC.

Looking at the suggestion from Mark, how about you continue working on
the simplified implementation for now., and then once we have completed
that and we still have time left in your GSoC period, we can talk about the
enhanced proposal?

> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/
> Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
> 
> Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
>

-- 
  thanks,
  Abhilash Raj (maxking)
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3

Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to