I wouldn't recommend this approach. If your email carries high business value, even a relatively small ISP could justify the time investment needed to resolve the situation. when we had issues with spamcannibal BL and the operator was unyielding, I went the time to research which of the providers using it were too reliant on it, and convinced them to drop the list - it was a local mail provider in hungary, with relative notability in-territory.
in the larger scope of mail volume? sure, doesn't matter. but why hurt even one country's performance just because there are millions of other mail users? that doesn't make sense. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com > wrote: > Or just don't bother about some random DNSBL with ill defined criteria > > If Spamhaus lists you, or a few other such list you, then sure you have > problems. Other than that there's several dozen others around with a > comparatively minuscule userbase if at all. > > --srs > > > On 15-Jun-2016, at 8:36 AM, 陈俊平 <chenjunp...@corp.netease.com> wrote: > > > > SpamRats using is not clear, we may figure it out by our continuing > discussions. Or catch the notice of SpamRats. > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
