On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 20:53, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-14 at 18:55 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Heheee. I didn't know that Yahoo algorithms trust high volumes. Now I do, > > but this is not a solution. > > Going to search for an ISP (or a relay service) that is known to be > > "trusted" by Yahoo, because it sends enough volumes to Yahoo > > servers doesn't sound like something anyone would wish to go after when > > they have their own server. > > You misunderstood me. It is not that Yahoo automatically trusts high volume > senders, it is that Yahoo need to see a reasonable sample of email from a > sender before making decisions regarding how to treat that email. > And this reasonable sample is like how many? > > In your case, one possible reason for the delays could be that they do not > see enough volume from your IP address to make a determination that your > email does not need to be delayed. > Is the volume defined or arbitrarily decided? I could write a script to send 50 mails every hour to my own @yahoo.com address to achieve this :-) Since individual emails are probably not experiencing delays, you could > just route the list traffic through Amazon SES (or similar) - thus keeping > your independence as a mail server operator. > That is the idea I am not buying! There must be another way better than relying on another SP. > Again, tiny volumes may not be the cause of the issue, I'm just speculating > based on your assertion that you are doing everything else correctly. > > There we agree. Your suppositions are pretty okay for empirical/theoretical arguments. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-)
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
