It appears that Tobias Fiebig via mailop <tob...@fiebig.nl> said: > >Moin, > >On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 12:44 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop wrote: >> The distinction is essential, because it would be a terrible mistake >> to, for example, RFC2047-encode the "mailbox" construct in "From", >> "To", ... headers. An RFC2047-ignorant MUA or MTA can still >> correctly decode the addresses in those headers without caring about >> the display name encoding. > >Kind of a point; However, if I got John correctly, an SMTPUTF8 mail >having to go through a system that does not support it should simply >bounce?
Right. That's the 5.6.9 extended status message. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
