"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <mac...@opencsw.org> writes: > 2013/10/11 Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <mac...@opencsw.org>: >> Here's an idea: we >> could create an optional field in the recipe, which would be an >> explicit list of maintainers of that package. If it's not present, >> things work as previously. If it is there, it pins down the current >> maintainer, and the package does go to a new owner. > > Errata, a "not" is missing, I meant "the package does not go to a new owner."
I agree with this kludge only if its presence in the recipe is mandatory. -- Peter
