"Maciej (Matchek) BliziĆski" <mac...@opencsw.org> writes: > 2013/10/11 Peter FELECAN <pfele...@opencsw.org>: >> I agree with this kludge only if its presence in the recipe is mandatory. > > Hm. We could make it mandatory, but then the default value should be > "nobody" or something of the same meaning. The reason is that only a > subset of packages have people who care about them. If we copy the > current state from the package catalog, we'll effectively freeze the > current package-maintainer relationship mapping. We will also not know > whether there is anyone that cares about certain package. Therefore, > there will be no gain.
Really I do not understand. As shown in my previous messages, we know where to take the information, where to give it a good usage. Conceptually it's not difficult. Unfortunately I do not have the resources to implement this. >From my point of view, I consider this discussion closed as I don't like to run in circle chasing my tail. -- Peter