Maptitude - http://research.umbc.edu/~roswell/maptitude.html
>wow.
>
>usually if i need to make a data set, i make it in mapinfo 4.1 and import it
>to maptitude. is it just because i haven't bothered to learn how good
>maptitude is? any other MI/mapt users care to comment?
Bob,
I haven't worked with Mapinfo. I have digitized complete
parish(county)
parcel maps with 30000 parcels in Mapt and it works great. It is so much
easier
that AV.
We do a lot of hard copy presentations and I have gotten good comments
with AV. I am
trying to get City to 2001 and only use PowerPoint but they are kickiing and
screaming.
This is just MY opinion and observation.
Carl L. Chance
City of Lake Charles
>
>the one thing that i really like about maptitude is the quality of the
>printed output. i like the way it makes streets and hiway signs, and how it
>builds the legends. good looking output is so much easier with maptitude
>than with mapinfo. how is AV better at printed output than maptitude?
>
>thanks
>
>bob rogers
>south carolina
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
