Maptitude - http://research.umbc.edu/~roswell/maptitude.html
At 01:25 PM 2/7/01 +0000, you wrote:
>Maptitude - http://research.umbc.edu/~roswell/maptitude.html
>
>Carl.
>
>I am interested about the limits to which Mapt can be pushed. I am about to
>start
>a large project, involving some 150000 parcels. In the last 5 years I have
>preferred maptitude over other GIS, and I would like to use it for this
>project.
>However, I do not know how well Maptitude would perform with such a large
>database.
>
>In your experience, after digitizing the parcels, how did Mapt perform in
>managing
>(displaying, laoding, quetying) the database?
>
>Maybe the people at Caliper could provide some comments about actual
>applications
>of Mapt (or other of tbeir products) with large databases.
>
>Cheers,
>
Armando
First let me say that your programming and hints passed along here are
very impressive.
Larry Teeters and I installed Maptitude in Calcasieu Parish La. that has app
130,000 parcels (correct
me if I am wrong Larry). It was a ArcInfo e00 file that we imported to be used
by ordinary people.
It displays rather quickly on Windows Pent II 500's. In compressed or .cdf it
is very quick in just one
layer; NO TILES.
That file is almost 90 mgs. The taxdata that is joined to it is over 80 mgs.
In the smaller parishes (counties) that I have digitized of 30,000 parcels a
good computer will pop them
almost immediately.
Therefore, I think Maptitude will handle your project with ease. If you are
going to be digitizing the complete
150,000 parcels just save your work regular as I am sure you do. I save by
date.
Carl
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
