I read your message three times actually. And I do maintain what I
wrote.

Thanks,

Charles.

Le jeudi 04 octobre 2012 à 14:20 +0100, Tom Davies a écrit :
> Hi :)
> Hmm, try reading my post rather than ignoring it and pretending it
> says soemthing other than what it really says.
> Regards from
> Tom :)  
> 
> 
> 
>         
>         ______________________________________________________________
>         From: Charles-H. Schulz
>         <charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org>
>         To: Tom Davies <tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk> 
>         Cc: "marketing@global.libreoffice.org"
>         <marketing@global.libreoffice.org> 
>         Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:54
>         Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
>         [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice
>         3.6.2
>         
>         
>         Public announcements are obviously marketing. Someone
>         repeatedly
>         complaining that software comes with bugs on the marketing
>         list is not
>         related to marketing.
>         
>         Charles.
>         Le 4 oct. 2012 14:48, "Tom Davies" <tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk> a
>         écrit :
>         
>         > Hi :)
>         > Ahh, sorry.  I didn't realise that public announcements and
>         press releases
>         > have nothing to do with marketing.
>         > Apols and regards from
>         > Tom :)
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > >________________________________
>         > > From: Charles-H. Schulz
>         <charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org>
>         > >To: "marketing@global.libreoffice.org"
>         <marketing@global.libreoffice.org>
>         > >Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:30
>         > >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously??
>         Fw:
>         > [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice
>         3.6.2
>         > >
>         > >Tom,
>         > >
>         > >The points you are making are repeated at each release. I
>         cannot really
>         > >help if you refuse to understand how we work or how
>         software development
>         > >works. But as we are on the marketing list we need to work
>         on marketing
>         > and
>         > >not lose our time with recurring rants that are not related
>         to marketing.
>         > >
>         > >We must discipline ourselves if we are on this list and
>         post on it: we
>         > work
>         > >on marketing and stay focused on it.
>         > >
>         > >Thank you for your understanding.
>         > >
>         > >Charles.
>         > >
>         > >Charles.
>         > >Le 4 oct. 2012 14:01, "Tom Davies"
>         <tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>         > >
>         > >> Hi :)
>         > >> Again.  The only advantage listed for the new release in
>         the newest
>         > branch
>         > >> of LO is that it's "more stable".  What is it more stable
>         than?  Is it
>         > more
>         > >> stable than the 3.5.6?
>         > >>
>         > >> Putting anything mentioning bug-fixes and possible
>         regressions just
>         > makes
>         > >> people wonder what new bugs and new regressions are
>         likely to appear in
>         > >> this new release.  Most profitable software companies
>         avoid mentioning
>         > the
>         > >> possibility that their new software might be buggy and
>         have new
>         > regressions
>         > >> despite the fact we know that both are likely.  I think
>         we should avoid
>         > >> mentioning it too until they become more open and honest
>         about the
>         > >> possibility.
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >> Possibly marginally better to say "latest" rather than
>         "last" unless you
>         > >> include a date.  "Last" sounds fairly finally and hints
>         that it
>         > happened a
>         > >> long time ago.  I don't know why.  Both really mean
>         roughly the same
>         > thing
>         > >> if you look them up in a dictionary.
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >> Again there are tons of advantages to the newest branch
>         but stability is
>         > >> not one of them.  If people want stability then they are
>         better off
>         > chosing
>         > >> the latest release in the older branch.  If they want,
>         for example,
>         > better
>         > >> compatibility with "other" formats and programs (ie such
>         as MS's) then
>         > >> 3.6.x is probably best.
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >> Please.  Can we have those circular or just plain wrong
>         arguments again
>         > >> about
>         > >> 1.  "I haven't noticed any bugs so far and few people
>         have reported
>         > >> bugs".  Therefore no bugs really exist because things
>         don't exist until
>         > >> after they have been discovered.  For example, the water
>         on Mars didn't
>         > >> exist until there were photos of it.
>         > >>
>         > >> 2.  "Any bugs found need to be reported against the
>         earliest version of
>         > >> LO/OOo they can be found in."
>         > >>
>         > >> 3.  Rinse and repeat.
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >> 1.  "It must be more stable.  It's newer."  Therefore it
>         must be more
>         > >> stable.
>         > >>
>         > >> 2.  "We must expect new branches  to have more bugs as a
>         result of
>         > having
>         > >> much greater functionality"
>         > >> 3.  "Older branches focus on bug-fixes and therefore tend
>         to have less
>         > new
>         > >> added functionality"
>         > >>
>         > >> 4.  Therefore "the only thing we can say about new
>         branches is that they
>         > >> are more stable."
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >> 1.  "All software has bugs."  [Perhaps implying that LO
>         is no more
>         > stable
>         > >> than java]
>         > >>
>         > >> Regards from
>         > >> Tom :)
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>         > >> >From: Italo Vignoli
>         <italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org>
>         > >> >To: annou...@documentfoundation.org
>         > >> >Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 12:05
>         > >> >Subject: [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation
>         announces LibreOffice
>         > >> 3.6.2
>         > >> >
>         > >> >Berlin, October 4, 2012 - The Document Foundation (TDF)
>         announces
>         > >> >LibreOffice 3.6.2, for Windows, MacOS and Linux, solving
>         bugs and
>         > >> >regressions and further improving the stability of the
>         program for
>         > >> >corporate deployments. The best free office suite ever
>         is quickly
>         > >> >becoming the de facto standard for migrations to free
>         office suites,
>         > >> >thanks to the quickly growing feature set and the
>         improved
>         > >> >interoperability with proprietary software.
>         > >> >
>         > >> >The growing number of LibreOffice adoptions by private
>         and public
>         > >> >enterprises is a demonstration of the improvements
>         brought to the
>         > legacy
>         > >> >code by TDF, thanks to over 500 developers who are
>         focusing on
>         > stability
>         > >> >and quality (in addition to new exciting features).
>         > >> >
>         > >> >The last public administration to migrate has been the
>         city of
>         > Limerick,
>         > >> >Ireland's third largest city, where LibreOffice is now
>         used on all 450
>         > >> >desktops in use at the city's six main locations
>         including the three
>         > >> >public libraries, the fire department, the municipal
>         museum and the
>         > City
>         > >> >Gallery of Art.
>         > >> >
>         > >> >The community behind LibreOffice will gather in Berlin
>         for the second
>         > >> >LiboCon from October 17 to October 19. During three
>         days, company
>         > >> >representatives and volunteers will discuss their
>         experiences, learning
>         > >> >from each other in the true spirit of the community.
>         > >> >
>         > >> >Registration for the conference end on October 8,
>         Registration for the
>         > >> >conference ends on October the 8th. If you want to join
>         in, please
>         > >> >register at this address:
>         > http://conference.libreoffice.org/registration.
>         > >> >
>         > >> >LibreOffice 3.6.2 is available for immediate download
>         from the
>         > following
>         > >> >link: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/. Extensions
>         for LibreOffice
>         > >> >are available from the following link:
>         > >> >http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center.
>         > >> >
>         > >> >Change logs are available at
>         > >> >
>         > >>
>         >
>         
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-6-1-release-3.6.2.1.log
>         > >> >(fixed in 3.6.2.1) and
>         > >> >
>         > >>
>         >
>         
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-6-1-release-3.6.2.2.log
>         > >> >(fixed in 3.6.2.2).
>         > >> >
>         > >> >Short link to The Document Foundation blog:
>         http://wp.me/p1byPE-jV.
>         > >> >
>         > >> >--
>         > >> >Italo Vignoli - Director
>         > >> >phone +39.348.5653829 - skype italovignoli
>         > >> >email italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org
>         > >> >The Document Foundation
>         > >> >Zimmerstraße 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
>         > >> >Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
>         > >> >Legal Details: www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
>         > >> >
>         > >> >--
>         > >> >Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
>         > announce+h...@documentfoundation.org
>         > >> >Problems?
>         > >>
>         http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>         > >> >List archive:
>         http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/announce/
>         > >> >
>         > >> >
>         > >> >
>         > >> >
>         > >> --
>         > >> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
>         > marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
>         > >> Problems?
>         > >>
>         http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>         > >> Posting guidelines + more:
>         > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>         > >> List archive:
>         http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
>         > >> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived
>         and cannot be
>         > >> deleted
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >
>         > >--
>         > >Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing
>         +h...@global.libreoffice.org
>         > >Problems?
>         >
>         http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>         > >Posting guidelines + more:
>         http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>         > >List archive:
>         http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
>         > >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived
>         and cannot be
>         > deleted
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > --
>         > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing
>         +h...@global.libreoffice.org
>         > Problems?
>         >
>         http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>         > Posting guidelines + more:
>         http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>         > List archive:
>         http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
>         > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and
>         cannot be
>         > deleted
>         >
>         >
>         
>         -- 
>         Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing
>         +h...@global.libreoffice.org
>         Problems?
>         http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>         Posting guidelines + more:
>         http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>         List archive:
>         http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
>         All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and
>         cannot be deleted
>         
>         
>         
>         




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to