******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
thanks dennis. clearly, she cherry-picked. the branding of her targets as white supremacists, racists and fascists causes most of her trouble i think. i agree with amith that it sounded like earlier attacks from nutty pro-zionists, who repeatedly launched accusations of antisemitism against alexander cockburn. "the left" has a lingering problem and this is emblematic of what's eating it. however, i will agree that counting articles can raise legitimate questions, just not this hysteria. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Brasky via Marxism" <marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> To: "Charles Faulkner" <lacena...@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:15:04 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism] Counterpunch promoting left-right alliance (aka "Querfront")? ******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. ***************************************************************** CP co-editor Joshua Frank replies on my Facebook page - We publish 100 articles a week, she's singling out 3 writers at most, which we publish on occasion - of course not all of their stuff. For instance, we don't run PCR's crazy 9/11 truth theories. But I'm sure that the "editorial collective" (Jeff and myself) has an agenda to team up with the far-right. Very obvious. Talk about conspiracy theories. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Charles Faulkner via Marxism > > > the case for cp being a white supremacist/fascist periodical is overstated > by half and undermines mr. greenstein's credibility. the limits of such a > quantitative analysis are obvious. i'd really hate to waste too much time > on such bizarre argumentation. if i have to i'm willing to address some of > the particulars but, really, isn't even a cursory look at the "evidence" > enough? > > the weaker claim that cp is diluting its left credentials by providing a > forum for the libertarian (that's what i'll call it) right seems worthy of > consideration. > > _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/lacenaire%40comcast.net _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
