[The Times of Israel]<https://www.timesofisrael.com/>
Analysis

JPLO Note - The intuitive conclusion of these Jewish academics is not a naive 
rejection of Jewishness as could be the case amonst the Jewish assimilationist 
Left, but rather a perception of the initial motivation for the founding of the 
Jewish Bund in 1897. The Jewish Bund was the first Anti-Zionist movement 
resulting from its rejection of the Zionist acceptable of fascism as inevitable 
and so refused to organize against the Nazi and fascist parties during , before 
and after the Holocaust-Churben.
Now the essence of fascist Zionist is evident. The deductive conclusion is to 
rebuild the Jewish Bund.
https://Jewish-Socialist-Bund.net/JPLO

Does an American Jewish historian’s rejection of Zionism signal a broader trend?
Hasia Diner’s recent op-ed calling Zionism a ’naive delusion’ has raised 
hackles among American Jews
By Ben Sales<https://www.timesofisrael.com/writers/ben-sales/>
3 August 2016, 3:57 am
[Does an American Jewish historian’s rejection of Zionism signal a broader 
trend?]
NEW YORK (JTA) — Hasia Diner is one of the most acclaimed American Jewish 
historians in the country. A product of the Habonim Dror Zionist youth 
movement, she is a former Fulbright Professor at the University of Haifa in 
Israel.
Now, she’s calling Zionism a “naive delusion” and says she feels uncomfortable 
entering a synagogue that celebrates its support for Israel.
Diner’s op-ed<https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.734602> discussing her 
disillusion, which appeared Monday on the website of the Israeli newspaper 
Haaretz, immediately stirred passionate and angry responses among readers, 
including her fellow academics. It also raised the question whether her 
distancing from Israel makes her an outlier, or reflects a growing trend among 
American Jews, in general, and the Jewish academic elite in particular.
Diner, who directs New York University’s Goldstein-Goren Center for American 
Jewish History, writes in her op-ed that she stopped being a Zionist in 2010, 
and now feels uncomfortable visiting many American Jewish institutions because 
of their support for Israel. She blames Zionism for the disappearance of “vast 
numbers of Jewish communities.” She condemns Israel’s occupation of the West 
Bank, as well as the growth of its haredi and right-wing sectors.
Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition
by email and never miss our top stories
Newsletter email address
Get it
By signing up, you agree to the terms<https://www.timesofisrael.com/terms>
Israel “is a place that I abhor visiting, and to which I will contribute no 
money, whose products I will not buy, nor will I expend my limited but still to 
me, meaningful, political clout to support it,” Diner writes.
“The Law of Return can no longer look to me as anything other than racism,” she 
writes, referring to the Israeli law that bestows automatic citizenship on 
immigrants with at least one Jewish grandparent.
In a later portion of the op-ed, co-written with Babson College history 
professor Marjorie Feld, Diner writes that their renouncing of Zionism signals 
a broader trend in the American Jewish community. More and more Jews, they 
imply, do not support Israel.
“Though we certainly do not claim to speak for all American Jews, as scholars 
we know we are a part of something much larger, something that, we assert, 
should be shaking the foundation of American Jewish leaders,” they write. 
“There is a growing gap between these leaders and the people for whom they 
claim to speak.”
The op-ed has certainly shaken the foundation of one American Jewish scholar: 
historian Jonathan Sarna, who penned a 
response<https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.734804> to the op-ed 
Tuesday in Haaretz. Both acclaimed in their field, Sarna and Diner each 
published histories of American Jewry in 2004. Sarna accused Diner and Feld of 
believing “demonic” myths about Israel and wrote that they “sacrifice truth to 
advance their newfound ideology.”
“Diner and Feld’s current view is at least as much a ‘naïve delusion’ as the 
earlier one that they rejected,” he wrote. “Sadly, instead of drawing serious, 
nuanced, scholarly lessons from history, they have provided us with just what 
they claim Israel’s supporters once gave them: propaganda.”
(Sarna is a member of the board of JTA’s parent organization, 70 Faces Media.)
Diner told JTA Zionism was once “one of the most important parts of my 
existence” and that her shift away from it has been “painful.” As late as 2014, 
she signed on as a founding member of the academic advisory council of The 
Third Narrative, a pro-peace initiative of Ameinu, the progressive Zionist 
alliance.
But she feels that speaking out is necessary, and that she speaks for a wide 
swath of American Jews.
“It’s the kind of thing people whisper about in metaphorical terms,” she said. 
“The younger one is, the more one is negative about this conflict of [being] 
Jewish and Israel, and the kind of politics that come out of Israel and the 
like. I think there is an enormous world out there of American Jews who are not 
at all far from this position.”
Diner and Feld aren’t the first American Jewish academics this year to publicly 
advocate criticism of Israel. In October, Harvard University government 
professor Steven Levitsky and Yale University economics and law professor Glen 
Weyl wrote an 
op-ed<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-zionist-case-for-boycotting-israel/2015/10/23/ac4dab80-735c-11e5-9cbb-790369643cf9_story.html>
 in the Washington Post supporting a boycott of Israel on the grounds that it 
would be the only way to meaningfully advance the peace process.
“I feel like I’m part of a silent large minority,” Weyl, 31, told JTA. “There’s 
a lot of Jews of my generation who are very, very unhappy with Israel, but who, 
on the other hand, have no trust [in] anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist extremist 
groups representing Palestinians or political Islam or things like that. I 
don’t think my position is actually so small.”
Polls show young Jews growing more critical of Israeli policy. While 
three-quarters of Jews over 50 feel attached to Israel, according to a 2013 Pew 
Research Center study of American Jewry, only 60 percent of Jews aged 18 to 29 
feel attached. Among that demographic, only 26 percent said Israel is making a 
sincere effort toward peace.
“There’s no question that liberal American Jews are increasingly uncomfortable 
with Israel,” said Steven Cohen, a Jewish social policy professor at Hebrew 
Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, who attributed part of the 
distancing from Israel to a broader disaffiliation with Jewish life. 
“Unfortunately, people tend not to distinguish the government from the country 
from the ideology, and legitimate criticism of government policy often flows 
over to alienation from the country and disavowal of Zionism.”
Sarna said discontent with Israel among American Jews could be situational, 
having to do with the distrust between President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime 
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He also dismissed the notion that criticism of 
Israel is unwelcome in Jewish intellectual circles.
“American Jews are always happier when the president of the United States and 
the prime minister of Israel are on very good terms,” he told JTA. “When Bill 
Clinton and Yitzhak Rabin were on the best of terms, they were very happy. That 
could happen again.”
But Diner, who has written extensively about Diaspora Jewry and the American 
Jewish experience in particular, would prefer a more fundamental shift among 
American Jewry: One where Zionism is one of several “icons of Jewish identity,” 
not the predominant one.
“There was a time when there was a much broader and bigger conversation,” she 
said. “That’s become less and less possible.”


https://www.timesofisrael.com/does-an-american-jewish-historians-rejection-of-zionism-signal-broader-trend/amp/






Dr. abraham Weizfeld

PhD  UQAM,  M.A.  York U.,  B.Sc.  UdeW

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

514 235 7187

Montréal



Nation,  Society  and the State :

the reconciliation of Palestinian and Jewish Nationhood



http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/7308/1/D2843.pdf

http://bookstore.authorhouse.com/Products/SKU-000425888/NATION--SOCIETY--AND--THE-STATE.aspx







https://independent.academia.edu/AbrahamWeizfeld



Skype/Yahoo/Twitter : eibieman



http://www.youtube.com/abraham.weizfeld/





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#39385): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39385
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116361879/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to