Am 16.07.2012 um 20:08 schrieb Arnaud Nicolet: > Hmm… I've taken a long time trying to figure out which codec to use. Indeed, > I wasn't sure of my results (comparing two same pictures saved using a > different codec is hard). I basically want to loose as less quality as > possible, but not waste dozen of giga bytes per minute of movie (which the > RAW format does), which is certainly what everyone wants. But speed wasn't > considered until now. > Perhaps I may ask your opinion here?
If there is a codec like Apple Intermediate which takes less time to compress and not huge file size, you may want to switch. Greetings Christian -- Check out the Omega Bundle: http://www.omegabundle.com/ _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
