Gents, I haven't experimented programmatically with codecs, but have been in active video production for many years. Without doubt the delivery codec that has the best picture per GB is the H.264. It is processor intensive, both encoding and playback, but most modern machines have the horsepower. Blu-ray, Youtube and others have standardized on it. The fastest encoder is the x264, free from Sourceforge, for PC and Mac, and I think unix.
Best, Dave On Jul 16, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote: > > Am 16.07.2012 um 20:08 schrieb Arnaud Nicolet: > >> Hmm… I've taken a long time trying to figure out which codec to use. Indeed, >> I wasn't sure of my results (comparing two same pictures saved using a >> different codec is hard). I basically want to loose as less quality as >> possible, but not waste dozen of giga bytes per minute of movie (which the >> RAW format does), which is certainly what everyone wants. But speed wasn't >> considered until now. >> Perhaps I may ask your opinion here? > > > If there is a codec like Apple Intermediate which takes less time to compress > and not huge file size, you may want to switch. > > Greetings > Christian > > -- > Check out the Omega Bundle: > > http://www.omegabundle.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list > [email protected] > https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
