> I think i read somewhere that you get 20 mins per 650 MB disc, which is much
> lower quality than DV, in which you get 10 about mins to 2 GB (so that
> comes to about 32.5MB per min of MDcam Vs 204.8MB per min of DV - and that
> assumes that the video isn't compressed more for the conversion to QT.)
Sounds ilogical to me....
1) A 120 minutes movie on a DVD takes less than 4GB, that comes down
to less than 35MB per minute!
2) Somewhere I heard the MDCam uses the same compression as DVD Video,
and no one complaines about that one.
3) Are you sure its 10 minutes for 2 GBytes and not 10 minutes on 2
Giga Bits?
DVD based video recorders for the home consumer are starting to be
introduced. I'm sure people will accept that quality!
Cheers,
Ralph
--
=======================================================================
Ralph Smeets Functional Verification Centre Of Competence - CMG
Voice: (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46 STMicroelectronics
Fax: (+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11 5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70 38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FRANCE
=======================================================================
"For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then
something happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination:
We learned to talk."
-- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
