On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Randall Arnold <tex...@ovi.com> wrote:
> > I do disagree with the production device requirement though. Prototypes > should be allowed also, and if this program is to include Beagleboards, > Pandaboards, et al, then the requirement certainly needs to be broadened (or > subcategorized). > I agree with you. As the this needs to be broadened to cover development platforms and not just production devices. > > I am wondering what budget? I imagine most of this will be per individual > contributing companies, eg Intel, TI, Nokia, et al. Unless we are just > talking a program administrative budget? If so, what would that cover other > than devices? > Not sure who wrote up the initial wiki's or the intent behind it. But the following comes to my mind. The devices tend to be donated. However, usually there are additional costs to factor in like shipping & handling, custom/duties must be factored in (this tends to vary from country to country and the shipping carrier fees). Apart from this I can't forsee a additional budget need. > We have TI ready to provide Pandaboards (3 to 5 total in December) to > developers (I will find out from TI if that is a broad number only or if we > can identify a set specific to Meego). > Can you please clarify your question? > Will they need to channel this effort through the LF? > Either way is fine - we will just work through the finalized community device process. If LF will channel the devices (including shipping & handling) after MeeGo community decide who the board should go through - that will work for us. --Jayabharath
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list MeeGo-community@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community
