On 25/02/11, James Ausmus wrote:
> The QML code is clearly marked as being Apache 2.0
> licensed.

Right, not BSD, but close.

> As far as whether I would be personally offended if
> you forked my code - I'd certainly appreciate taking
> a look at any patches you would want to send my way,
> but I won't be upset (I'd even understand!) if you
> decide that's an untenable method of contributing
> and decide to fork.

My concept of "fork" is to push the QML code to my Github
account so I can keep working on it in a sane open way. Of
course you, or anyone, would be more than welcome to pull
whatever my input may, or may not, be.

My concern is that I am really keen to start "fiddling"
with that kind of interface (excellent job btw) but it's
a waste of time if it's not in some open coordinated repo
and I obviously don't have write perms to Intels internal
repo so Github is the next best.

This is great, from my POV we have some potential progress
with the essence of what all the future MeeGo UXs should
consist of, different QML views of a Qt backend foundation.

--markc
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-community mailing list
MeeGo-community@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines

Reply via email to